Belonging is one of the basic human needs - coming just after physiological and safety needs on Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs - without which there is no foundation on which to build those higher order needs of self-esteem and self-actualisation. The best way to belong to a group is to act like the group and as such, those stories formed a collective understanding of what is required of good boys and girls, thereby taking out the guesswork of what constitutes success for each. What a relief! (Except, that is, for those poor individuals who did not resonate with these themes. Such 'misfits' became outcasts or masqueraders in a society with gender roles so clearly defined. As such, self-esteem and self-actualisation was not an easily achieved need, but that’s another story…) The value of shared understandings of group norms continues to be relevant to social functioning in modern times - one such example is marital satisfaction, which is found to be significantly higher in traditional marriages, structured around clearly defined gender roles as outlined above, than in modern, non-traditional marriages due in part to the ill-defined role expectations for husbands and wives. Such findings are consistent with a range of relevant Social Psychology theories - after all how does one belong to the group (in the example just mentioned, the married couple) when one does not know what is expected of the group members (as may be the case in non-traditional marriages)? For the most part, our grandparents and great-grandparents were borne out of morally directive tales where girls and boys, and women and men knew their place. Those constructs of mind, however, are somewhat malleable. Through a multitude of forces our morality and sensibilities have progressively evolved through the demands of changing times - which may include war, natural disaster and economic depression - and through the active influence of those previously mentioned outcasts - which may be consolidated within social movements, such as the Suffragettes or Emancipationists. It is clear then that the stories upon which we are nurtured both reflect and direct our social identity, forging a shared morality and defining normative behaviours. As such, clear cultural demarcations can be drawn based upon these differing emergent identities both within and between social groups such as the upper-class -v- the working-class or Russians -v- Venezuelans, respectively. However, there is a dynamic which underpins this process and transcends borders of time and space: archetypes. Carl Gustav Jung, the founder of Analytical Psychology states, "The archetype is a tendency to form such representations of a motif - representations that can vary a great deal in detail without losing their basic pattern ... They are indeed an instinctive 'trend'". |